3 ms·

I don't know who you work for . But you care too much about corporate profits and not enough about humans

rlpb 8y ago
I'm not employed in any related industry. I do travel for work, so if anything I'm more impacted on the consumer side as a frequent traveller. However, the consumer has voted, again and again, for cheaper airline tickets over anything else. If that's what they want, then banning overselling would be contrary to that as it would cause ticket prices to rise. I live in the EU and am quite happy with the current statutory compensation arrangements here.
- Firadeoclus 8y ago
  I'm ambivalent about overselling, but I think your argument is flawed. Consumers can only "vote" for what's on offer, and you cannot individually escape a prisoner's dilemma/race to the bottom scenario without making yourself worse off.
  - rlpb 8y ago
    I agree and this is what I meant by "The downside is that a free market isn't very good at adjusting to unlikely individual events" above. Since banning overselling would increase ticket prices, there will inevitably be some passengers who would suffer as a result. Statistically we'd find that some passengers can no longer afford to go on holiday, etc. These passengers surely want a cheaper ticket so they have _some_ opportunity still. Instead, I think the most reasonable solution is to allow oversell but enforce adequate compensation by statute, which is what we have today in many places. The difficulty is in deciding what constitutes adequate compensation. Too much and we'll be back to the "no oversell but inefficient and therefore high ticket price" situation. Too little and traveling would be a mandatory gamble that passengers might be wiped out (eg. a weekend away ruined with no compensation to go again another time, etc). A balance is needed. Banning overselling completely however is I think too far in the wrong direction.

rlpb 8y ago

I'm not employed in any related industry. I do travel for work, so if anything I'm more impacted on the consumer side as a frequent traveller. However, the consumer has voted, again and again, for cheaper airline tickets over anything else. If that's what they want, then banning overselling would be contrary to that as it would cause ticket prices to rise. I live in the EU and am quite happy with the current statutory compensation arrangements here.

Firadeoclus 8y ago
I'm ambivalent about overselling, but I think your argument is flawed. Consumers can only "vote" for what's on offer, and you cannot individually escape a prisoner's dilemma/race to the bottom scenario without making yourself worse off.
- rlpb 8y ago
  I agree and this is what I meant by "The downside is that a free market isn't very good at adjusting to unlikely individual events" above. Since banning overselling would increase ticket prices, there will inevitably be some passengers who would suffer as a result. Statistically we'd find that some passengers can no longer afford to go on holiday, etc. These passengers surely want a cheaper ticket so they have _some_ opportunity still. Instead, I think the most reasonable solution is to allow oversell but enforce adequate compensation by statute, which is what we have today in many places. The difficulty is in deciding what constitutes adequate compensation. Too much and we'll be back to the "no oversell but inefficient and therefore high ticket price" situation. Too little and traveling would be a mandatory gamble that passengers might be wiped out (eg. a weekend away ruined with no compensation to go again another time, etc). A balance is needed. Banning overselling completely however is I think too far in the wrong direction.