3 ms·
There alot of those "are they necessary?" prefixes around. But isn't "ver" the same as "for", which I imagine is the same as "pro" from latin. Meaning either "b
by ObscureScience 8y ago
There alot of those "are they necessary?" prefixes around. But isn't "ver" the same as "for", which I imagine is the same as "pro" from latin. Meaning either "before" or "causing" or "facilitating" or similar.
- Tor3 8y agoThat is correct (causing or facilitating, in this case). The (I think most common) word for 'understand' in Japanese translates to something like 'it resolved for me'.
- blattimwind 8y agoNo, not really. It is used in many, many words, with no obvious intrinsic meaning of the prefix itself (and sometimes it's pretty much just redundant), although some clusters of meaning can be made out (often ver- signifies something negative or grave, for example). verstehen, vergehen (active), vergehen (passive), verdammen, verabreden, verfahren, verlaufen, verfestigen, verändern, verallgemeinern, veranschaulichen, veranlassen (ver+an+lassen), verlassen, verärgern, verarmen, verbiegen, verdrehen, ...
- ascar 8y agoI can't explain it well, but I somewhat have the feeling that "ver" also mostly indicates an irrevocable change. All of the words you listed can be used as a status for current conditions. The best example is probably "versterben". It's hard to grasp, but I think "ver" has some subliminal meaning. The "ver" words feel different than their synonyms.
- ascar 8y agoOut of curiosity I looked it up and Duden actually has a page on it [1]. It can be broken down to 8 different cases according to Duden and there is actually some logic behind it (though not the best and most consistent :D). [1] https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/ver_ https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/ver_