5 ms·
Excuse me, but isn't "undercover" redundant in "undercover spy"?.. I mean, all spies work undercover :-)
by bouncycastle 8y ago
Excuse me, but isn't "undercover" redundant in "undercover spy"?.. I mean, all spies work undercover :-)
- ConcernedCoder 8y agoI actually liked "talking audibly" better... it reminded me of the movie "Naked Lunch" where Bill Lee was conversing "telepathically" about something completely different from the inane verbal chit-chat he was having with Tom Frost in the medina... http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/adiab/clips/FF_Cronenberg_NakedLunch_POV.mp4/view http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/adiab/clips/FF_Cronen...
- darkpuma 8y agoNot really, some spies have official diplomatic status. Their public job title may not be "spy", but it's generally assumed that the host country knows what's up.
- wycy 8y agoThere are spies with official cover and non-official cover[0]--the latter of which is normally to what "undercover spy" refers. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-official_cover https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-official_cover
- secfirstmd 8y agoAlso spies is really an overarching term and means shedloads of different things in reality. I mean if you break it down in the simplest way possible (for example what the public see on TV and call a spy), what they are seeing is various people who are: -Handler -Agent -Agent of influence -Analyst -Mobile Surveillance Officer -Tech officer etc etc etc