I agree, but this is the equivalent of choosing not to walk through dangerous neighborhoods. At a personal level, where you don't make the world but have to dea

I agree, but this is the equivalent of choosing not to walk through dangerous neighborhoods. At a personal level, where you don't make the world but have to deal with reality as it is, this is wise if you have the option. Save yourself if you can. But at the same time, you should also support policy changes that you believe will make the dangerous neighborhoods safe. Save others, too, if you can. Anything that makes a neighborhood "dangerous" should be removed as long as it's not simply replaced by something equally dangerous. If a market or medium is too dangerous to enter because there is no realistic alternative to submitting to the 800-lb gorilla, the gorilla's ability to threaten rather than compete must be eliminated.