> The piece of the puzzle that you're missing is that people commit crime, and if they find out why they got in trouble with the law, they'll know which behavio

> The piece of the puzzle that you're missing is that people commit crime, and if they find out why they got in trouble with the law, they'll know which behavior triggered it and will learn to avoid that behavior. > It sucks, but automating sharing reasons for illegal actions will be self-defeating. Yes I changed your text from corporate "illegal" to government "illegal". We wouldn't let THAT fly in a court of law. We have rules on that, like the 4th and 5th amendment. Right to have the charges read before them; right to face their accuser; right to a fair trial; right to be secure in their houses/papers/effects So what are the charges? "We will not tell you what you did." Who's the accuser who said I did the thing? "It cannot be in the courtroom. It is an algorithm. Secure in your effects? You waived them (unilaterally) in dealing with a monopoly. Too bad, soo sad. Fair trial? SURELY YOU JEST!