> How is this different than taking a picture of someone? The image is owned by the photographer, not the subject(s) according to current laws. There is no rea

> How is this different than taking a picture of someone? The image is owned by the photographer, not the subject(s) according to current laws. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public. Meanwhile, advertisements and depictions of people who have unlicensed but copyrighted images tattoos on their person open up those who distribute media with their likeness to lawsuits by the owners of the copyrighted material.