4 ms·
"Because the writer in question had a copyright on her website where the article can be found, the content of the website is under copyright law." Ouch. Surel
by studer 16y ago
"Because the writer in question had a copyright on her website where the article can be found, the content of the website is under copyright law."
Ouch. Surely there must be a better source than some junk written by a clueless "digital journalist" with the sole purpose of flooding search engines?
- cs_1 16y agoWade through at your leisure. http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=196994196748&topic=23238 http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=196994196748&topic... Same primary source regardless of what outlet covers it. NPR: http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2010/11/05/131091599/the-day-the-internet-threw-a-righteous-hissyfit-about-copyright-and-pie http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2010/11/05/131091599/the-... Economist: "A host of Facebook and other denizens have traced over 100 other articles that have appeared in the magazine to The Food Network, NPR, Martha Stewart, Sunset, and others. A Google Docs spreadsheet maintains the list." http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/11/internet_shaming http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/11/internet_sham... The list: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmTaIPHPnkSedGFhbHo1d1FIR2oxNWJLaDZLeXhEVEE&hl=en#gid=0 https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmTaIPHPnkSedGFhbHo... Over 160 entries just from recent issues that people could find copies of.