3 ms·
Depending on how you define "direct" and "trustworthy", you may never find evidence meeting your threshold. Some people lack "direct, trustworthy" evidence for
by chillacy 8y ago
Depending on how you define "direct" and "trustworthy", you may never find evidence meeting your threshold.
Some people lack "direct, trustworthy" evidence for the holocaust, after all. Anything which we don't experience directly (which is a lot of knowledge) we'll have to get from other sources.
- mistermann 8y agoSure, but you could link hundreds of photographs, testimonials from victims, etc This question is more interesting, no one even tries to provide evidence. They'll link to the judgement, but what evidence was the judgement based on? If someone knew what the underlying evidence was, surely someone would say it, wouldn't they? Yet I've never had a single person provide that evidence, or stop and say "hmmmm, that's a good question". I wonder if it's another one of these deals: https://theintercept.com/2018/02/06/lie-after-lie-what-colin-powell-knew-about-iraq-fifteen-years-ago-and-what-he-told-the-un/ https://theintercept.com/2018/02/06/lie-after-lie-what-colin...