2 ms·
The previous title was referring to Red, which is the same Red that I linked to.
by azhenley 8y ago
The previous title was referring to Red, which is the same Red that I linked to.
- zepto 8y agoThe linked article has never had anything to do with the article you linked to. The term ‘Red’ is used as a contraction by the ‘Readable Human Format’. It’s not clear to my why you think the previous title would be referring to a project other than the one that it linked to.
- azhenley 8y agoRed is the programming language I linked to. This Readable Human Format is an example of something you can do using the Red language that I linked to. This article on Readable Human Format makes you install the Red language I referred to: > Install only older version, for windows: https://static.red-lang.org/dl/win/red-063.exe https://static.red-lang.org/dl/win/red-063.exe
- zepto 8y agoNo. It’s not the same language. This documentation processor is a different thing, even though it may be produced by the same people.