3 ms·
What you describe looks how agile was supposed to be. What the op described looks like a perversion of agile perpetrated by managers who either don't understand
by danmaz74 8y ago
What you describe looks how agile was supposed to be. What the op described looks like a perversion of agile perpetrated by managers who either don't understand why agile was born, or do understand it, but only care about increasing their power instead of getting things done.
- henrik_w 8y agoI know. When I first read the XP book by Kent Beck it was a revelation. That was the first time I saw a methodology that I felt worked and agreed with my own experience. Planning everything out in advance is hopeless. There are two great quotes that I think capture this: “A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.” John Gall “Enlightened trial and error outperforms the planning of flawless intellects.” David Kelley It is really sad to read about how often the agile ideas have been misused!
- fhbdukfrh 8y agoHow about "a team of skilled developers is likely to be successful with any software development approach; an inexperienced or untalented team is doomed regardless of the chosen methodology" After 20 years that's been my experience
- josho 8y agoYes. But unfortunately not every team can be made entirely of rockstars. So the purpose of a methodology is to increase the probability of success for a moderately talented team.
- throwawayloco 8y agoWhat is is about "skilled developers" that makes you think "rockstars"? Inexperience is easy correct if you have skilled developers and the inexperienced person is willing to learn. I do have to admit, I'm not sure about what to do with untalented...