Weren't most of the subsidies through the already existing "Excelsior program"? https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/Excelsior_Overview_2017.pdf https://esd.

Weren't most of the subsidies through the already existing "Excelsior program"? https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/Excelsior_Overview_2017.pdf https://esd.ny.gov/sites/default/files/Excelsior_Overview_20... I'm just confused about what people want. The program was long derided for creating too few jobs: https://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/politics-on-the-hudson/2017/06/07/new-york-job-creation-investigation-big-break-for-business/101745402/ https://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/politics-on-the-hu... Now that it's Amazon, it's creating too many jobs and (therefore) costing too much money? I don't support tax subsidies in general, but the program was already signed into law, you can't just change the rules that you set yourself just because you realize in hindsight it's a bad deal. Honestly, the people of NYS elected Cuomo twice, they should have to live with the consequences.