3 ms·
It shows people want the worst kind of discourse. You might not like it but if such a sizable community does its a shame it can't live on its own. Not everyone
by sl1ck731 8y ago
It shows people want the worst kind of discourse. You might not like it but if such a sizable community does its a shame it can't live on its own.
Not everyone gets online to peruse HN or even learn anything at all and there isn't anything wrong with that.
- setr 8y agoWell no, it shows that people are willing to accept some worthless discourse; but that doesn’t mean it all is. It’s the same as when you spend an hour trafing memes with your friends — its utterly worthless, but that doesn’t mean all of your conversation looks like that. But anyone else who wanders in blindly might only see the meme trading and think that’s all you do. In the context of 4chan, its just wandering into the wrong board (eg /b/), or the wrong thread, and thinking that was the only thing that happened round these parts. Like the whole hacker and gore thing came out of a single subcommunity, but became the public face of 4chan; but none of the other boards cared about it (although bots would randomly start getting through captcha and spam gore/loli porn, which most users simply hid or ignored. Some people praised the bots for keeping out the riffraff (those unwilling or unable to ignore things they dislike), but otherwise, they were far more an idea people had about 4chan and its users than the userbase actually did or supported