4 ms·
I would advocate for legal rights to use an adblocker! If we don’t, it’s going to be banned under CFAA in the future. Ads suck! Nobody has the right to force th
by heheocoenev 8y ago
I would advocate for legal rights to use an adblocker! If we don’t, it’s going to be banned under CFAA in the future. Ads suck! Nobody has the right to force these on me!
- notyourwork 8y agoYou don’t have to listen to Spotify right?
- rrix2 8y agonobody has the "right" to use a service, conversely.
- crankylinuxuser 8y agoAnd why exactly is that considered a fact? The closer you are to a monopoly, the more required you should be to serve all. We don't allow the electric company to kill your power because you made disparaging emails or bad messages online. And if you're a monopoly, you should be dealt with heavy handedly. Because power and money only further power and money. Anti-competition laws stem that to an extent.
- jsgo 8y agoThere are plenty of music streaming services at the same level of quality and within the ballpark of paid subscriber base as Spotify. It wouldn’t qualify as a monopoly. Music streaming isn’t the kind of good that falls under common carrier so I don’t think the analogy of the electric company fits. People can easily go through life not subscribed to one. I for one only have iTunes Match which isn’t the all-you-can-eat style of Spotify/Apple Music/Play Music/Amazon Music/Tidal/etc.
- angus-prune 8y agoNo they don't. And I think that we have a right to block ads that to block any and all ads that we receive. Conversely, any (non-critical) service has the right to stop showing us ads or serving us in any other way.