4 ms·
Can you explain more about the 誤 example you provided? When you say it's barely recognizable, do you mean simplified vs traditional? Because to me (as a native
by bgee 8y ago
Can you explain more about the 誤 example you provided?
When you say it's barely recognizable, do you mean simplified vs traditional? Because to me (as a native Chinese speaker) the Japanese and traditional look almost identical. I can't comment on traditional vs simplified because I can read both.
If it's simplified vs traditional, I wonder why OS/browser prefers to render the character in simplified form (I assume the Chinese font you are using has both styles).
- fenomas 8y ago> the Japanese and traditional look almost identical They have different radicals on the lower right. Unless there's some reason to consider the two radicals equivalent (there isn't in JP, I wouldn't know about CN) they're different characters.
- titanix2 8y agoStill it’s the same character. Enjoy the 16 others variants: http://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/word_attribute.rbt?quote_code=QTAzODM4LTAxMA http://dict.variants.moe.edu.tw/variants/rbt/word_attribute....
- fenomas 8y agoThey are considered variants of each other for linguistic reasons, but that's not what GP was talking about. GP suggested the characters look almost identical, and I'm pointing out that they clearly don't.
- Grue3 8y agoFor reference this is what I see in my browser: https://imgur.com/a/F3pFzCm https://imgur.com/a/F3pFzCm