He did spark a different conversation. So many of them, in fact, that you know his name as a consequence of people having those very conversations. >Being famo

He did spark a different conversation. So many of them, in fact, that you know his name as a consequence of people having those very conversations. >Being famous doesn't really indicate on its own that you've sparked any particular conversation, so I don't see how it's evidence of that. That's funny. Edward Snowden's name doesn't seem to be brought up in random-ass conversations. He seems to always come up when people are talking about security and surveillance. I wonder if that's a spurious correlation, or if it is evidence of something? Perhaps some kind of impact that he's had on conversations about those very subjects? Perhaps you have a better explanation of this correlation?