4 ms·
If I'm not mistaken, NASA and DARPA have already initiated plans to turn this into reality under the "100-Year Starship" program: http://www.kurzweilai.net/nasa
by liuhenry 16y ago
If I'm not mistaken, NASA and DARPA have already initiated plans to turn this into reality under the "100-Year Starship" program: http://www.kurzweilai.net/nasa-ames-worden-reveals-darpa-funded-hundred-year-starship-program http://www.kurzweilai.net/nasa-ames-worden-reveals-darpa-fun...
EDIT: As to this: "This is premature," Ed Mitchell of Apollo 14 wrote in an e-mail. "We aren't ready for this yet.", I think it's really necessary. A large part of the plan is a push for private investment and developing the private spaceflight industry. If what's happened in the past with both automobiles and aviation is any indication, there won't be any sort of massive innovation or progress unless spaceflight is commercialized. The amount of stagnation in the development of human spaceflight is absurd considering the way aviation took off in the last half of the 20th century.
Burt Rutan makes a very compelling argument to this end: (http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/burt_rutan_sees_the_future_of_space.html http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/burt_rutan_sees_the_future...)
- VladRussian 16y agoi completely agree about the shameful stagnation. There are 2 things - the threshold is too high and there isn't a killer app yet. The Rutan/Branson's venture has crossed the threshold, and they may potentially hit the killer app target if they increase the distance flying - ie. "2 hours from California to Sidney" instead of "from California to an island in the Pacific". $130K instead of $13K in 1st class - it bites, yet the early adopters and economy of scale may as usually help here. I have my fingers crossed :)