> Local government can't be trusted to allocate public resources in a fair way... so we defer that to a private company? Public resources in NYC are already al

> Local government can't be trusted to allocate public resources in a fair way... so we defer that to a private company? Public resources in NYC are already allocated by private companies; that's a big part of why local government can't be trusted in the first place. Amazon is just saying that if they build a huge building in NYC, then they want to control public resource allocation in the area of the building in place of whatever private company would already be doing this. > Where's the guarantee (or even suggestion) that Amazon would use their tax break to improve local infrastructure? That's literally that the deal is, or at least a substantial portion of it: https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2018/11/13/heres-what-amazon-stands-to-gain-in-nyc-incentives.html https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2018/11/13/heres-wh...