11 ms·
The paren matching really is key. I was blown away by how intuitive it is. Previously I had preferred haml, but without paren highlighting it can be hard to tel
by sgrove 16y ago
The paren matching really is key. I was blown away by how intuitive it is. Previously I had preferred haml, but without paren highlighting it can be hard to tell the depth you're working at relative to another tag.
This could be solved by some editor placing arrows showing which tags are parents to your current position, but I don't think that's available (at least not in emacs, sadly), and paren highlighting is.
Also, never missing a closed tag, mispellings, abstractions, etc. All very nice. When loading a broken page in chrome, it's crazy how much the html will be transformed, so that it's hard to tell why the page renders a certain way. A bit easier with this approach.
- rapind 16y agoI agree. It looks really clean. I'm not about to throw out haml for it yet, but I'm definitely intrigued.