4 ms·
The truth is, if they let it die It's highly likely it was not useful. G+, wave, RSS feeds, etc, legacy services that needed to be replaced for security sake.
by duckMuppet 8y ago
The truth is, if they let it die It's highly likely it was not useful. G+, wave, RSS feeds, etc, legacy services that needed to be replaced for security sake.
It's unfortunate end users have to be dragged along kicking and screaming, but thankfully google is willing to do it for the end users own good.
- tvanantwerp 8y agoNot useful to whom? I used to greatly enjoy their RSS reader. I'm still enjoying Inbox, for as long as I can keep it, and I dread going back to regular Gmail. When Google kills a product, it's more likely than not for their own good, not mine.
- holtalanm 8y agoMost of the useful inbox featues have been moved into the new Gmail though. I mean, i get it, I liked inbox too, but gmail is basically inbox 2.0 now.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- tvanantwerp 8y agoI did give Gmail another try, but it absolutely did not feel like Inbox to me--at least not the parts that made me switch in the first place.
- Something1234 8y agoDoesn't mean it isn't crap? It's so much slower than the old Gmail. Things don't immediately commit, and I get asked to I want to leave when I close the webmail now. Everyone just needs inconsistent systems now. What ever happened to consistent systems and changes being committed as soon as possible.