4 ms·
Two things that strike me. First, what is the back of the hand thing all about? Is it less sensitive? Is it somehow less demeaning? It doesn't make sense to
by malyk 16y ago
Two things that strike me.
First, what is the back of the hand thing all about? Is it less sensitive? Is it somehow less demeaning? It doesn't make sense to me.
Second, if he "made contact" and then immediately retreated...what did he make contact with? Was it clearly your junk? Or could it have been anything? How is it at all effective to do the pat down if all they do is retreat when they feel a little resistance. That could be anything.
And one more thing for good measure...
It's not the pleasantness or not of the pat down that is central to this issue. It's the effectiveness of it, the invasiveness of it, etc. Sure, your guy was nice...that doesn't have any impact on the policy being good or bad at all (not to say that is what you implied).
- kgermino 16y agoThey use the back of he hand on more private areas so that the fingers are facing outwards. The idea is to prevent any kind of grabbing: perceived, actual, accidental, intentional, whatever. Edit: iPod typos
- joshes 16y agoI always thought that it was because the palm of the hand was more sensitive than the back, but the finger theory is much more sensible.
- tibbon 16y agoI too have wondered- wouldn't you just hide something in your crotch then?