3 ms·
I never paid 30% to a credit card company, and apps certainly come with a support burden. I'd argue the biggest difference is in the ease of installation. The
by enjo 16y ago
I never paid 30% to a credit card company, and apps certainly come with a support burden.
I'd argue the biggest difference is in the ease of installation. The big thing Apple has done is figure out how to take disparate software and make setup easy and automatic. That's were the support benefits come in. When selling software for Windows, Mac, or even Palm you spent most of your support budget just helping people install it.
Beyond that, however, the economics of the app store certainly aren't better than what we traditionally had. There are literally thousands of 'small apps' that have been sold for as long as the internet has existed. The various MP3 players (like winamp) spring to mind immediately.
The only difference with the app-store is that discoverability is a whole lot harder and the downward pricing pressure has meant that traditional advertising works pretty poorly (it's hard to buy traffic when your conversion is $1).
- gte910h 16y agoYou'd pay more than 30 cents to many companies to process a 99 cent payment, 31.9 cents for google checkout for instance. The micropayments are what's solved via the app store.
- crs 16y agoYou also do not have to host the app your self, so your not paying for the bandwidth. That cost is included in the 30% cut apple takes.
- enjo 16y agoThat's a really small cost, however. Bandwidth is stupid cheap.