4 ms·
The OP does know that HAML supports straight HTML as well right? The following is perfectly valid: %h2 Heading content %p This is just some <em>emphatic</em>
by jameskilton 16y ago
The OP does know that HAML supports straight HTML as well right? The following is perfectly valid:
%h2 Heading content
%p This is just some <em>emphatic</em> text. Maybe I'll talk about <code>$BASH_VERSION</code> here.
Personally I'll never go back to writing straight HTML ever again. It's ridiculously verbose, uses characters that are very hard to type, and it's easy to forget to close a tag and not realize it.