>Clojure in my very subjective opinion is doing a bit better than that due to ability to augment software written in Java. OCaml can embed or be embedded in na

>Clojure in my very subjective opinion is doing a bit better than that due to ability to augment software written in Java. OCaml can embed or be embedded in native applications, but that's not the point. I think that the main problem with Clojure is the lack of types. Just look at how much Scala is more popular than Clojure, although it's also a strange functional language derived from OCaml/SML. There is a common opinion that types are a necessity, even ruby, racket and python are adding them. Clojure people are just trying to substitute types with a runtime evaluated contracts/Hoare triplets, which is not an adequate substitution.