3 ms·
Seems only relevant on the surface. What AMI tried to do to Bezos is far worse, legally at least, than what Gawker did to Thiel.
by jonny_eh 8y ago
Seems only relevant on the surface. What AMI tried to do to Bezos is far worse, legally at least, than what Gawker did to Thiel.
- thucydidesofusa 8y agobut what Gawker did to Hulk Hogan was far worse than what AMI is alleged to have done to Bezos. And it's Gawker's treatment of Hogan that put them into bankruptcy. Many organizations successfully violate the law because their victim is unable to secure the legal representation they need. If we find out the AMI can't withstand giving a rich person the treatment they reserved for those who couldn't afford legal remedies, then Bezos ruining them is as philanthropic as Thiel saving us from Gawker.