4 ms·
I believe he was intentionally using hyperbole there. For example, if he were being literal, why would he mention "firing" anyone, since he obviously can't act
by mcantor 16y ago
I believe he was intentionally using hyperbole there. For example, if he were being literal, why would he mention "firing" anyone, since he obviously can't actually do that?
- mattmaroon 16y agoIt doesn't matter. It says something about him regardless. It says something about the snobbishness here too that nobody else thinks its even noteworthy.
- mcantor 16y agoSorry--I'm not trying to be condescending here, but, are you familiar with what exaggeration really means?