3 ms·
> They are threatening to post photos of him sexting. Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so f
by hypochondria 8y ago
> They are threatening to post photos of him sexting.
Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway combined with losing custody of ~70 billion dollars in the coming divorce? I'm not so sure. Their privacy was already thoroughly invaded before this latest development.
- reitzensteinm 8y agoIt doesn't matter if it's worse. Going through a public divorce doesn't make one stop caring about an invasion of sexual privacy. It doesn't work like that.
- markbnj 8y ago> Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway Yes, unequivocally. I suspect any PR person would agree. You can doubt information published by a disreputable source, but most people believe the images they see, even in this deep faked era.