3 ms·
> I'm surprised to hear you say that, since I find the two very different. 747s are much noisier (unless you're up top) and have less humidity & cabin pressure,
by inferiorhuman 8y ago
> I'm surprised to hear you say that, since I find the two very different. 747s are much noisier (unless you're up top) and have less humidity & cabin pressure, making them materially less comfortable on long flights.
IMO even on the lower deck the A380 is the quietest jetliner I've been on. The last 747 I was on (United) still had the old, comfy, interior. The 787 may have the benefits of a quieter, more humid cabin but the slimline seats and tighter seat pitch made it a much less pleasant experience for me (United was among the worst of the bunch).
- secfirstmd 8y agoUnited is always amongst the worst of the bunch.
- georgebarnett 8y agoI have stopped flying United for this reason. ~14 long haul flights (13+ hours) per year I used to buy from them, gone - because they screwed up the seats. Idiots.
- rfugger 8y agoSeat pitch and width is largely up to the airlines. Korean Air 787s aren't bad at all in economy.