5 ms·

Bullish on bitcoin b/c of its highly resilient characteristics. Might not process as many transactions per second and it might pollute more than the average ban

Bullish on bitcoin b/c of its highly resilient characteristics. Might not process as many transactions per second and it might pollute more than the average bank, but sure as hell dont need to worry about a natural disaster or freak incident single handedly taking out the entire network.

amaccuish 8y ago
There's always one...
mikeash 8y ago
I’d wager that WF is still processing a lot more transactions than Bitcoin is even during this outage.
jameskilton 8y ago
Wells Fargo customers must be terrified that their money is going to be gone when the service finally comes back. This downtime is obviously to prevent a bank rush while the leadership leaves the country with millions in customer funds. Oh wait...
- deevolution 8y ago
  Queue infinite stream of downvotes. News flash, you dont need an exchange to store or transact bitcoin!!! And people using exchanges should understand the risks associated with using a centralized service.
  - perl4ever 8y ago
    What do you mean by "need"? If you don't have an exchange you can trust, doesn't that make things worse, because you have to determine whether you can trust your counterparties and you have to secure your assets with your own resources? Matt Levine wrote the other day: "...people think they don’t trust the traditional financial system, but in fact its most basic functionality—not forgetting where it put your money—is so reliable that people just keep assuming without evidence that the crypto system must work the same way. Surely a big crypto exchange must have, like, systems, and lawyers, and more than one employee, so you can trust it, right? Wrong! If I ever buy Bitcoins I will keep them at Gemini, the Winklevoss twins’ exchange, just because I am absolutely sure there are two of them."
    - deevolution 8y ago
      The main argument here is about the resiliency of the bitcoin network. Whatever your talking about has nothing to do with it.
- shawnz 8y ago
  Very funny, but you're describing a failure mode of bitcoin exchanges rather than the bitcoin network, which is not what the parent was talking about.
  - lenticular 8y ago
    You need bitcoin exchanges for any kind of practical transaction. Not only that, people who don't keep their money on exchanges lose their coins all the time. It's just the worst store of value. It would be more practical to transact in wheat like the Sumerians did. Or just dollars. This stuff just keeps on happening, but crypto folks always make some excuse as to why it's not actually a systemic problem.
    - shawnz 8y ago
      > You need bitcoin exchanges for any kind of practical transaction. Not only that, people who don't keep their money on exchanges lose their coins all the time. OK, what's your point? Nobody claimed it was perfect, just that it happens to be immune to the particular failure mode which happened here. Can you accept that that is true? > This stuff just keeps on happening, but crypto folks always make some excuse as to why it's not actually a systemic problem. What "stuff"? People losing coins? People lose cash all the time, does that make it a "systemic problem" with cash? They are just different technologies with different trade-offs. It's understandable that you hate the cryptocurrency community but that doesn't mean you need to deny every possible advantage of cryptocurrencies.
      - perl4ever 8y ago
        "it happens to be immune to the particular failure mode which happened here" What exactly do you mean by "immune to the particular failure mode"? Is bitcoin immune to server or data center outages? Perhaps if you very narrowly limit which ones you are talking about to the bitcoin network per se.
        deevolution 8y ago
pastor_elm 8y ago
decentralization wins out again. How many times do we have to go through this...
pjc50 8y ago
Or you could have a Quadriga-like incident where a single person's death or fraud takes out an entire bank?
- SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
  I think the argument here is that you don't need to keep your Bitcoin in a bank, and instead just horde it all under your digital bed.
  - deevolution 8y ago
    It's essentially no different than carrying a credit card in your wallet... The bitcoin network IS the bank, your key is your card. There's no need to horde anything under said "digital bed". It's frightening to see so many ignorant comments.
    - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
      Except that if you lose your credit card your business doesn't collapse leaving everyone in the lurch.

amaccuish 8y ago

There's always one...

mikeash 8y ago

I’d wager that WF is still processing a lot more transactions than Bitcoin is even during this outage.

jameskilton 8y ago

Wells Fargo customers must be terrified that their money is going to be gone when the service finally comes back. This downtime is obviously to prevent a bank rush while the leadership leaves the country with millions in customer funds. Oh wait...

deevolution 8y ago
Queue infinite stream of downvotes. News flash, you dont need an exchange to store or transact bitcoin!!! And people using exchanges should understand the risks associated with using a centralized service.
- perl4ever 8y ago
  What do you mean by "need"? If you don't have an exchange you can trust, doesn't that make things worse, because you have to determine whether you can trust your counterparties and you have to secure your assets with your own resources? Matt Levine wrote the other day: "...people think they don’t trust the traditional financial system, but in fact its most basic functionality—not forgetting where it put your money—is so reliable that people just keep assuming without evidence that the crypto system must work the same way. Surely a big crypto exchange must have, like, systems, and lawyers, and more than one employee, so you can trust it, right? Wrong! If I ever buy Bitcoins I will keep them at Gemini, the Winklevoss twins’ exchange, just because I am absolutely sure there are two of them."
  - deevolution 8y ago
    The main argument here is about the resiliency of the bitcoin network. Whatever your talking about has nothing to do with it.
shawnz 8y ago
Very funny, but you're describing a failure mode of bitcoin exchanges rather than the bitcoin network, which is not what the parent was talking about.
- lenticular 8y ago
  You need bitcoin exchanges for any kind of practical transaction. Not only that, people who don't keep their money on exchanges lose their coins all the time. It's just the worst store of value. It would be more practical to transact in wheat like the Sumerians did. Or just dollars. This stuff just keeps on happening, but crypto folks always make some excuse as to why it's not actually a systemic problem.
  - shawnz 8y ago
    > You need bitcoin exchanges for any kind of practical transaction. Not only that, people who don't keep their money on exchanges lose their coins all the time. OK, what's your point? Nobody claimed it was perfect, just that it happens to be immune to the particular failure mode which happened here. Can you accept that that is true? > This stuff just keeps on happening, but crypto folks always make some excuse as to why it's not actually a systemic problem. What "stuff"? People losing coins? People lose cash all the time, does that make it a "systemic problem" with cash? They are just different technologies with different trade-offs. It's understandable that you hate the cryptocurrency community but that doesn't mean you need to deny every possible advantage of cryptocurrencies.
    - perl4ever 8y ago
      "it happens to be immune to the particular failure mode which happened here" What exactly do you mean by "immune to the particular failure mode"? Is bitcoin immune to server or data center outages? Perhaps if you very narrowly limit which ones you are talking about to the bitcoin network per se.
      - deevolution 8y ago

pastor_elm 8y ago

decentralization wins out again. How many times do we have to go through this...

pjc50 8y ago

Or you could have a Quadriga-like incident where a single person's death or fraud takes out an entire bank?

SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
I think the argument here is that you don't need to keep your Bitcoin in a bank, and instead just horde it all under your digital bed.
- deevolution 8y ago
  It's essentially no different than carrying a credit card in your wallet... The bitcoin network IS the bank, your key is your card. There's no need to horde anything under said "digital bed". It's frightening to see so many ignorant comments.
  - SketchySeaBeast 8y ago
    Except that if you lose your credit card your business doesn't collapse leaving everyone in the lurch.