The original argument was “The legislation in no way compromises the security of any Australians’ digital communications.” This is approaching a pi = 3 level f

The original argument was “The legislation in no way compromises the security of any Australians’ digital communications.” This is approaching a pi = 3 level falsehood because of the “in no way compromises” clause. There are many schemes that are outright illegal (in my not a lawyer interpretation of this law), and it nakedly makes the other schemes harder with state actors as additional points of failure.