The headline makes an amazingly weak claim. Since people still seem to be discussing what features of nerve impulses are significant (their frequency? precise

The headline makes an amazingly weak claim. Since people still seem to be discussing what features of nerve impulses are significant (their frequency? precise relative timing?) it would appear that a reasonable estimate of the information processing capacity of a single neuron is currently lacking, let alone an estimate for an entire brain taking account of redundancy. Does the comparison even make sense?