3 ms·
I'm sure someone must pay. But I can make assumptions all by myself with little to no help. What I could really use are details, facts, evidence. So I'm forced
by close04 8y ago
I'm sure someone must pay. But I can make assumptions all by myself with little to no help. What I could really use are details, facts, evidence. So I'm forced to reiterate, care to provide some?
I don't mean evidence that people want more privacy and someone is paying/putting up billboards advocating this. Do you have some evidence (anything) that these yet unnamed companies are behind a strategy to stain FB's image (as if it were needed) in order to have the privacy violation market all to the themselves?
Can you at least name one of these companies? Or maybe a hint on why Facebook doesn't even acknowledge this enemy?
- expertentipp 8y agoAn example from the street of a major German city: https://i.imgur.com/owlT9Rv.jpg https://i.imgur.com/owlT9Rv.jpg I have absolutely no insight into any lobbying activities, obviously.
- close04 8y agoThat doesn't really feel like an anti-FB campaign as much as a campaign to improve the FB experience and an "educational" one to raise awareness related to fake accounts. You can tell as much by their FB page.
- InternetOfStuff 8y agoThat billboard was made by Facebook themselves though, in an attempt to "educate" users on privacy, in a feeble attempt to appear responsible.