41 ms·
> "having a vaccine is risky" That risk is for all practical purposes, zero
by jostmey 8y ago
> "having a vaccine is risky"
That risk is for all practical purposes, zero
- henrikschroder 8y agoYes, but it's not actually zero, even if you remove all the false vaccine side-effects like autism and mercury poisoning. And that's where the irrational fear of vaccines attach itself. But the actual non-zero risk of death or other horrible side-effects from the diseases, they have nowhere to attach to. We don't get regular stories in the media of kids dying of measles, because we almost eradicated it. So given this, some parents weigh one risk incorrectly way higher than 0, and the other risk incorrectly at 0, and then they make the rational decision not to vaccinate their kid. And I think it's important to understand that anti-vax parents actually don't make irrational choices, they make rational choices, but they're made on the grounds of an incorrect and horribly wrong risk analysis. Hopefully, news stories like this increase the general awareness that measles is a terrible disease, which then can change the risk analysis that people are doing. It just sucks that a bunch of kids have to suffer needlessly because of stupid fearmongering.
- masonic 8y agoThere are outliers. My 6th grade best friend's sister died from the "Swine Flu" vaccine in the 70s. That said, a good parent plays the percentages.