3 ms·
I find works of philosophical non-fiction written by horror fiction writers useful for not romanticizing the present: “Like many who have tried their hand at m
by trevyn 8y ago
I find works of philosophical non-fiction written by horror fiction writers useful for not romanticizing the present:
“Like many who have tried their hand at metaphysics, Bahnsen declared that, appearances to the contrary, all reality is the expression of a unified, unchanging force—a cosmic movement that various philosophers have characterized in various ways. To Bahnsen, this force and its movement were monstrous in nature, resulting in a universe of indiscriminate butchery and mutual slaughter among its individuated parts. Additionally, the “universe according to Bahnsen” has never had a hint of design or direction. From the beginning, it was a play with no plot and no players that were anything more than portions of a master drive of purposeless self-mutilation. In Bahnsen’s philosophy, everything is engaged in a disordered fantasia of carnage. Everything tears away at everything else … forever. Yet all this commotion in nothingness goes unnoticed by nearly everything involved in it. In the world of nature, as an instance, nothing knows of its embroilment in a festival of massacres. Only Bahnsen’s self-conscious Nothing can know what is going on and be shaken by the tremors of chaos at feast.”
- Thomas Ligotti, “The Conspiracy Against the Human Race”
- apocalypstyx 8y agoEugene Thacker's 'In the Dust of This Planet', 'Starry Speculative Corpse', and 'Tentacles Longer Than Night' could probably also fit into this category.