3 ms·
You're probably right in general, but in this case the policy shifted risk from the contractor to the company, not the other way around. The $10 minimum meant t
by celtain 8y ago
You're probably right in general, but in this case the policy shifted risk from the contractor to the company, not the other way around. The $10 minimum meant that contractors were shielded from low payouts caused by a small tip, but also meant a lower payout for high tips.