4 ms·
For what audience? A HAM radio operator is very aware of the technical process going on, the proper etiquette, etc. It's pretty easy to adapt in that situatio
by Obi_Juan_Kenobi 8y ago
For what audience?
A HAM radio operator is very aware of the technical process going on, the proper etiquette, etc. It's pretty easy to adapt in that situation.
A random Twitch viewer has likely never thought about broadcast latency before, and has no real reason to. It's just an unintuitive experience when chat reacts to things that happened many seconds ago.
Voice chat is probably the worst because the network and software is notoriously unreliable. Is it latency, is something broken, did they just not hear me? Are we talking over each other, something that can easily happen in casual conversation vs. a radio transmission? That mental overhead is constantly there. Imagine trying to explain to your mother that she should end all her statements with "over" and confirm whenever she hears something. Are you really not sure why people find this difficult, or are you just so proud of your own technical knowledge that you've lost any kind of reasonable perspective on the issue?
Lower latency is an unambiguous improvement in every regard; of course people care about it.
- oconnore 8y agoHow on earth did this turn into an ad hominem about my technical pride? Because I’m ok with slowing down the pace of a conversation?
- FooHentai 8y agoNo, but because you chose to open with: >I’m not sure why people find high latency to be so difficult. Phrasing it that way makes it likely you will be interpreted as believing you're effortlessly better than everyone else at the subject at hand.