4 ms·

> previous versions of x265 removed film grain/digital noice I noticed it as well, glad it gets fixed. Do I need to toggle/change any particular parameter, or

• kristofferR 8y ago
  Eh frankly, x265 is not worth it unless you're an expert encoder or don't care about transparency. If you're not making multiple test encodes and fiddling with the encoding options, you should stay on x264. If you're interested, here are the settings for four recent transparent expert x265 encodes: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/PRZFyrgxzc/ https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/PRZFyrgxzc/ You could compare them to find interesting options to review.
• ksec 8y ago
  >I noticed it as well, glad it gets fixed. It is not that it is fixed, it is just that putting out a encoder that is good at PSNR and SSIM are like 10% of the work, actually getting that film grain right takes forever. That is if you care about these sort of things, other wise you can encode a Digitally Cleaned Video with x265 and get ~30% reduction in file size compared to x264.