5 ms·
Aw, it was the 18th century: they lost kids all the time.
by inherentFloyd 8y ago
Aw, it was the 18th century: they lost kids all the time.
- jackfraser 8y agoRedundant Array of Inexpensive Descendants
- stcredzero 8y agoRedundant Array of Inexpensive Descendants Here's my evolutionary "Just So Story" for why human kids like to wander away and put things into their mouths. Basically, they acted as food tasters for the group. Makes sense, since the group has invested in them the least, they know nothing important, and in a state of nature, they're likely to die anyways.
- pavlov 8y agoI suspect eating insects also provided meaningful additional nutrition for toddlers.
- stcredzero 8y agoMore evidence the behavior is adaptive!
- rusk 8y agoNot to mention developing the immune system. They always go for the dirtiest thing in the room. Acquire and share.
- MisterOctober 8y agoIndeed! Insects actually provide a non-negligible food source for many people today. Example : Chapulines
- orf 8y agoHaving a kid back then was a huge investment, no? The mother is weaker for half a year, eats more and could die in childbirth
- stcredzero 8y agoHaving a kid back then was a huge investment, no? Yes, but the same investment was made in every other member of the group as well. However, everyone who made it well past childhood had a lot more knowledge, food, and material invested in them.
- nyolfen 8y agothat would select against the kids most enthusiastic about putting unsafe food in their mouth
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- stcredzero 8y agoIt would, however, select for the most attentive mothers. However, a kid discovering a heretofore unknown poisonous plant would be a benefit. So too, would a kid discovering a heretofore unknown edible thing.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- benj111 8y agoBut kids don't like bitter things (like cabbage), to stop them eating potentially poisonous things, that's what I understood anyway. Plus try and get a 2 year old to try new things. Is this something you've observed on teething children? They tend to chew things to ease the pain.
- woodpanel 8y agoWhile I chuckle reading your explanation I think you forgot to consider how much nursing is deeply ingrained in our nature by us being mammals. > in a state of nature, they're likely to die anyways. So while this part, where they would die if left alone, is certainly right, it would make the whole concept of us humans not laying eggs, putting some semen and mud on them and disappear into the wilderness an evolutional waste of time. Plus, I have some acquaintances whom I suspect would very much prefer to go about their business that exact same way. So it's not a demand side problem either.
- stcredzero 8y agoSo while this part, where they would die if left alone, is certainly right Where did I say that the babies would be left alone and abandoned? Apparently you are unaware that in human communities with low technology, infant mortality can be pretty high alarmingly. You're also apparently stating that parents looking after children is not a "state of nature." (Or you're ascribing that to me, which, given you're alone in this, indicates you need to work on reading comprehension.)
- grkvlt 8y ago> make the whole concept of us humans not laying eggs, putting some semen and mud on them and disappear into the wilderness an evolutional waste of time. > putting some semen and mud on them and disappear into the wilderness what?
- MisterOctober 8y agoDamn fine hypothesis. Juvenile mortality is naturally really high from the get-go [not just for humans, but practically all life forms] -- why not have them engage in the most high-risk experiments? I think that's brilliant.
- laumars 8y agoWe have a pretty good understanding of why kids put stuff in their mouths and it’s more about exploration and their mouths being more centre of their sensory experience at younger ages. But the following link explains it better than I could: http://drgailgross.com/parenting-families/why-does-my-8-month-old-baby-put-everything-in-her-mouth-and-how-can-i-get-her-to-stop/ http://drgailgross.com/parenting-families/why-does-my-8-mont... Anecdotally, my daughter didn’t have this behaviour. Even at a very young age she’d only ever put food stuff in her mouth. However I’ve seen so many other kids, children of friends and relatives, put random objects in their mouths to know that my daughter is the exception to the rule.
- tim333 8y agoThat explanation is a bit circular along the lines that kids like putting things in their mouths because they like putting things in their mouths. As to why we've evolved that way it's probably to build the immune system. It needs exposure to stuff in the environment to figure what to react to. The increase in asthma and allergies in the modern world is probably because kids don't get enough dirt exposure and then the immune system overacts later.
- laumars 8y ago> That explanation is a bit circular along the lines that kids like putting things in their mouths because they like putting things in their mouths. That's not what the article says at all. It says most of the babies sensory experiences are oral because they lack mobility to explore things with other tactile senses. Granted the article doesn't example this specifically but a lot of sensory input will be suckling (dummies, mother's nipple / bottle's teat, their own digits, etc). By the time they're a bit more mobile and can open their hand to grasp objects (remember the ability for a baby to even open their hand takes a few weeks to learn) happens, they've often already gotten into the habit of exploring the world via their mouths. It doesn't say it in that article I linked to, but I do vaguely recall reading elsewhere that because babies develop tactile senses on their hands later than the senses in their mouth, babies will often have more nerve endings in their mouth. However I cannot find a source for that so this might be a detail I'm miss-remembering.