3 ms·
I don't disagree, but the time that passes limits your ability to respond in the present. Don't eschew current news because it's slight, because it's invite, b
by nkozyra 8y ago
I don't disagree, but the time that passes limits your ability to respond in the present.
Don't eschew current news because it's slight, because it's invite, because it's simplistic in form. That's the point.
- coldtea 8y ago>I don't disagree, but the time that passes limits your ability to respond in the present. What examples are there of any meaningful "responding in the present" that happened because of news (as opposed because of directly suffering some oppression on yourself)?
- zimpenfish 8y ago> What examples are there of any meaningful "responding in the present" Protest marches? Strikes? You could even include terrorism if you wanted.
- nkozyra 8y agoPending legislation? Environmental, economic peril? Our ability to react to news is often personal, but it can operate on a macro level as well.