8 ms·

For the last 4-5 years, Hacker News has been pretty much my only source of any kind of news outside of the topics that I work with on a daily basis. This is tru

For the last 4-5 years, Hacker News has been pretty much my only source of any kind of news outside of the topics that I work with on a daily basis. This is true. Before that, I did not read newspapers or follow any kind of journalism. I still recall being around age 12 or 13 and making a conscious decision not to watch TV anymore. It has been around just as much time since I last saw a TV news report. Maybe it has something to do with mentality? Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. I'm not even sure if that makes sense, but I know that newspapers don't make any sense whatsoever; despite it being the livelihood of so many folks. How can anyone justify reading news that only talk about negative things? I don't have time for that kind of nonsense in my life. I know the system is broken, corrupt, beyond repair -- why remind me about it every day?

salvadormon 8y ago
That's the same reason I don't watch news on TV, they're always covering negative stories about how politicians are corrupt, big organizations cheat the system, etc. I just don't feel like being more pessimistic than I already are.
zimpenfish 8y ago
> I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. Given the activism they're showing in, eg, the US, I think if you read the news, you'd be surprised how wrong you are. > How can anyone justify reading news that only talk about negative things? To be aware of them in order to help fix them?
- nailer 8y ago
  A lot of that activism is more performative than practical, judging by voter turnout.
  - perfmode 8y ago
    Votes are weak if there is no one or nothing of substance to vote for.
  - js8 8y ago
    Didn't the last US election have the largest turnout in the past century? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_elections https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_elections
    - nailer 8y ago
      It did, the activists lost.
  - SCdF 8y ago
    How so? The number of people who perform some kind of activism is way lower than voter turnout. What makes you think there are lots of people who are doing "performative" activism that isn't translating into them voting or otherwise participating in the system?
    - nailer 8y ago
      > What makes you think there are lots of people who are doing "performative" activism that isn't translating into them voting I don't think that. Activism isn't translating into non-activists voting, hence activism being performative.
- skilled 8y ago
  > To be aware of them in order to help fix them? Good one.
- gowld 8y ago
  How do you know what fixes are working if you only read negative things?
kriro 8y ago
I consider it a little dangerous to rely on a single news source. Granted HN as an aggregator is better than relying on a single paper but it's still a bit unhealthy to read all news in a HN framing (assuming you read comments+newsitem). Even if you just use it as an aggregator it's still fairly selective. Additionally, HN is very "high level". I don't know how involved you are in the community you live in but I always consume at least one "hyperlocal" paper (+local radio) to stay up to speed on the things that happen in my immediate neighborhood.
- paganel 8y ago
  > but I always consume at least one "hyperlocal" paper (+local radio) to stay up to speed on the things that happen in my immediate neighborhood. I use FB in order to stay up-to-date with news from my childhood town, of which I moved out 18 years ago. It kind of gives me a feeling of belonging, even though almost all of my friends and even my parents have moved out of that town.
lifeisstillgood 8y ago
HN is my news feed for tech, but I have realised that my news feed for "rest of the world" has reduced down to radio / TV weekly comedy shows. Things like BBC news quiz or Mock The Week, (similar to US's John Oliver/ Steve Colbert) actually do a fairly good job of capturing the headlines and providing concise updates. As well as enough cynicism to keep me on my toes. The only time it failed me was a few years back when a disgruntled Tory party donor spread rumours that the then PM David Cameron had put his dick in a pigs mouth as a university hazing ritual. As no mainstream media would ever dare print that, but people slowly got the right twitter link from friends, there were two weeks when a "oink oink" joke would cause half the country to convulse in laughter and the other half (me included) to wonder what the hell was going on.
- sureaboutthis 8y ago
  You have just stated that your source of news is comedians who were doing standup routines in nightclubs before their current TV gig and, in fact, still do comedy at night clubs (John Oliver for one). That's OK. A lot of people aren't aware of that. You can fix that.
  - icebraining 8y ago
    Can you be specific about what you find problematic about that?
    - sureaboutthis 8y ago
      You don't have a problem receiving your news from a comedian versus a trained journalist?
avip 8y ago
Same. HN is the only stream of "news" I consume. And I kind of miss the older HN where non-tech "news" was immediately flagged to oblivion. So now I have to consciously skip irrelevant stuff (arguably like this one).
- neuronic 8y ago
  > (arguably like this one) Your comment shows how conscious you are while skipping "irrelevant" stuff.
  - avip 8y ago
    Which was exactly my point. HN used to curate the content for me.
- icebraining 8y ago
  There was never such a time. pg himself (the creator of the site), who left in 2014, submitted way more liberally than just tech stuff: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=pg https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=pg
  - avip 8y ago
    Maybe you're right https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7494031 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7494031
samdoidge 8y ago
> I know the system is broken, corrupt, beyond repair -- why remind me about it every day? Perhaps only having Hacker News as your source of news has led to that mentality. That's not to say it isn't broken, or there isn't corruption, but I don't think things are beyond repair, and they can certainly be worse.
- skilled 8y ago
  > Perhaps only having Hacker News as your source of news has led to that mentality. Ok, next time I will omit the part where I say that HN has been my only source of news.
solipsism 8y ago
Wow you just shat on people who read the news and people who don't in a single comment, while elevating your own head-buried-in-the-sand preference as the elite choice. I'm not even mad! That's amazing!
- skilled 8y ago
  Thanks.
smt88 8y ago
> Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. Instead of doubting it, try doing some research. "Age does not impact people’s attentiveness to various news topics. Even the youngest adults are as likely to pay attention to news [...] as older adults. Further, they are no more likely than older adults to follow news on lifestyle topics."[1] > I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. This is incredibly condescending and seemingly not based in any statistical reality. > I know the system is broken, corrupt, beyond repair -- why remind me about it every day? Because knowing how "the system" is broken today (which differ from yesterday or last week) makes you an informed citizen. When enough informed citizens vote, the system is significantly less broken. If you don't inform yourself and vote, you are one of the reasons the system is still dangerously broken. I hope well-run governments are not a matter of life and death for you, because they are for billions of other people. 1. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/social-demographic-differences-news-habits-attitudes/ https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/...
- Brometheus 8y ago
  Thank you for this reply.
- icebraining 8y ago
  This is assuming the vote actually has a significant impact on the state of things. I vote, but I'm not sure I could justify that belief with evidence.
  - smt88 8y ago
    I saw a meme once that said, "I don't vote because I think it'll fix things. I vote so I know I'm not one of the reasons things are broken." Not sure if that helps, but thank you for voting!
    - icebraining 8y ago
      Sounds like the "Road Not Taken"※ - they think either choice will keep things broken, yet one of them makes all the difference. ※ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18380366 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18380366
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
krapp 8y ago
> For the last 4-5 years, Hacker News has been pretty much my only source of any kind of news outside of the topics that I work with on a daily basis. This is true. Why? Hacker News is a content aggregator, no different than Reddit, Twitter or Facebook. The posters here are not unbiased, nor are they likely to be experts in every subject they comment on, unless it's about tech, and then only maybe. I can understand preferring Hacker News for technical news, or to avoid mainstream news, but as a primary news source? I think you're letting HN's elitist cultural bias cloud your sense of objectivity if you think this one internet forum is a better a news provider than any other.
- icebraining 8y ago
  I'm not sure OP is saying HN is better. It might simply be the only site they visit regularly that happens to link to mainstream news articles.
giancarlostoro 8y ago
I'm with you, though I sometimes supplement it with news.google.com which at least mentions when certain articles are commentary. If a story interests me enough then I go ahead and research it from all major media sources, especially opposing sides and do my best to form a conclusion that makes sense, usually keeping those to myself since others will only have familiarity with one source or the next. Of course sometimes I land on the not-so-major media sources like blogs that call out mainstream media issues too. I'm what the mainstream media calls a millennial (only discovered I had that title after 10 years of being one apparently, shows how much I buy into the Media). I have seen time and time again how toxic the media can be even for democracy. During the last election where Ron Paul was a candidate they gave him the least amount of air time on television[0][1][2], and thus he became irrelevant to most Americans because they are glued to the TV and the news organizations, he wasn't the kind of person that would of sold advertisement eye balls I guess. I guess if you want a solid candidate to be president buy all the ad space most major news organization will offer? He was a rare gem I got excited to vote for but couldn't. [0]: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/ron-paul-media-blackout-confirmed/336698/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/ron-pau... [1]: http://www.journalism.org/numbers/are-media-ignoring-ron-paul/ http://www.journalism.org/numbers/are-media-ignoring-ron-pau... [2]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-ron-paul-getting-unfair-media-treatment/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-ron-paul-getting-unfair-medi...
Theodores 8y ago
HN is a good filter. If it makes it to HN and happens in the real world then it probably is worth taking note. Regarding your choice not to watch TV at age 12-13, this reminds me of reading tabloid newspapers at that age or possibly earlier. It all seemed so much below me and for people that must be thick.
- sureaboutthis 8y ago
  HN is NOT a good filter though it's better than some. Judging by the person's statement, he is around 18 years old. For all I know, so are you. And so are 80% of anonymous "news" sources posted here. Anonymous postings on the internet, no matter where, are the worst thing that has happened to civilization since anonymous reports to the police of wrongdoings of a neighbor.
  - gowld 8y ago
    non-anyomous postings are holding their own quite well. google.com/search?q=whatsapp+massacre
  - squish78 8y ago
    I can think of a few worse things that have happened to civilization
  - Theodores 8y ago
    The comment you are referring to was made by someone considerably older than eighteen. > Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. When people write of the 'new generation' they tend to be a generation older and slightly out of touch with this 'new generation'. I think you are allowing your assumptions to cloud your judgement somewhat. 80% of this so-called 'news' that you are seemingly quite assertive in defending is the creation of PR agencies. Not sure what relevance your comments on 'anonymous news' has to do with my comment. I stand by my original comment, there is no point getting engrossed in the Punch and Judy Trump show, Brexit or anything else of that ilk. There is also another question that has to be asked of news - 'does this affect my life or the world I live in?' This applies to sport too, following with a passion the comings and goings of sports celebrities is a waste of time unless you play the sport yourself. Hence HN is a very good filter. A normal news source will have stories that are clickbait, hard to not be interested in at an entertainment level. This attitude does not mean passivity, a lack of interest in the world and a lack of engagement in politics. On the contrary, people that shout at their TV to the tune of the latest Trumpisms are stuck on their sofa and not doing anything.
GordonS 8y ago
I've done the same, but only for the past few years. I grew tired, emotionally exhausted even, of being bombarded with strongly biased negativity, images of war, brutality, poverty and injustice, NIMBYism and fake outrage - and most of all, at my sense of helplessness against it all. I could do nothing about any of it, and resolved to remove it from my life. Since I did so, I've been much happier. I can't avoid all news - for example, I see non-tech stuff on HN sometimes, or see Trump's latest nonsense in my Twitter timeline - but with the exception of technical stuff on HN, I never seek it out.
thosakwe 8y ago
> Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. I think that you would know more about the information habits of the new generation if you actually researched it, instead of relying on HN as your only news source... This community definitely has a lot of biases of its own, no matter how much it tries to deny it, so really, I think that for anyone, getting news from multiple sources makes it easier to come up with a more holistic interpretation of current events.
tristanperry 8y ago
> I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. You're definitely wrong on this point (and as others have said, it's a condescending sentiment). This has always happened. I'm 28 and online quizzes and tests were _very_ common when I was school age. My parent's generation also took lots of quizzes and tests, albeit they were in newspapers and magazines (and you had to tally up your own results).

salvadormon 8y ago

That's the same reason I don't watch news on TV, they're always covering negative stories about how politicians are corrupt, big organizations cheat the system, etc. I just don't feel like being more pessimistic than I already are.

zimpenfish 8y ago

> I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. Given the activism they're showing in, eg, the US, I think if you read the news, you'd be surprised how wrong you are. > How can anyone justify reading news that only talk about negative things? To be aware of them in order to help fix them?

nailer 8y ago
A lot of that activism is more performative than practical, judging by voter turnout.
- perfmode 8y ago
  Votes are weak if there is no one or nothing of substance to vote for.
- js8 8y ago
  Didn't the last US election have the largest turnout in the past century? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_elections https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_elections
  - nailer 8y ago
    It did, the activists lost.
- SCdF 8y ago
  How so? The number of people who perform some kind of activism is way lower than voter turnout. What makes you think there are lots of people who are doing "performative" activism that isn't translating into them voting or otherwise participating in the system?
  - nailer 8y ago
    > What makes you think there are lots of people who are doing "performative" activism that isn't translating into them voting I don't think that. Activism isn't translating into non-activists voting, hence activism being performative.
skilled 8y ago
> To be aware of them in order to help fix them? Good one.
gowld 8y ago
How do you know what fixes are working if you only read negative things?

kriro 8y ago

I consider it a little dangerous to rely on a single news source. Granted HN as an aggregator is better than relying on a single paper but it's still a bit unhealthy to read all news in a HN framing (assuming you read comments+newsitem). Even if you just use it as an aggregator it's still fairly selective. Additionally, HN is very "high level". I don't know how involved you are in the community you live in but I always consume at least one "hyperlocal" paper (+local radio) to stay up to speed on the things that happen in my immediate neighborhood.

paganel 8y ago
> but I always consume at least one "hyperlocal" paper (+local radio) to stay up to speed on the things that happen in my immediate neighborhood. I use FB in order to stay up-to-date with news from my childhood town, of which I moved out 18 years ago. It kind of gives me a feeling of belonging, even though almost all of my friends and even my parents have moved out of that town.

lifeisstillgood 8y ago

HN is my news feed for tech, but I have realised that my news feed for "rest of the world" has reduced down to radio / TV weekly comedy shows. Things like BBC news quiz or Mock The Week, (similar to US's John Oliver/ Steve Colbert) actually do a fairly good job of capturing the headlines and providing concise updates. As well as enough cynicism to keep me on my toes. The only time it failed me was a few years back when a disgruntled Tory party donor spread rumours that the then PM David Cameron had put his dick in a pigs mouth as a university hazing ritual. As no mainstream media would ever dare print that, but people slowly got the right twitter link from friends, there were two weeks when a "oink oink" joke would cause half the country to convulse in laughter and the other half (me included) to wonder what the hell was going on.

sureaboutthis 8y ago
You have just stated that your source of news is comedians who were doing standup routines in nightclubs before their current TV gig and, in fact, still do comedy at night clubs (John Oliver for one). That's OK. A lot of people aren't aware of that. You can fix that.
- icebraining 8y ago
  Can you be specific about what you find problematic about that?
  - sureaboutthis 8y ago
    You don't have a problem receiving your news from a comedian versus a trained journalist?

avip 8y ago

Same. HN is the only stream of "news" I consume. And I kind of miss the older HN where non-tech "news" was immediately flagged to oblivion. So now I have to consciously skip irrelevant stuff (arguably like this one).

neuronic 8y ago
> (arguably like this one) Your comment shows how conscious you are while skipping "irrelevant" stuff.
- avip 8y ago
  Which was exactly my point. HN used to curate the content for me.
icebraining 8y ago
There was never such a time. pg himself (the creator of the site), who left in 2014, submitted way more liberally than just tech stuff: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=pg https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=pg
- avip 8y ago
  Maybe you're right https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7494031 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7494031

samdoidge 8y ago

> I know the system is broken, corrupt, beyond repair -- why remind me about it every day? Perhaps only having Hacker News as your source of news has led to that mentality. That's not to say it isn't broken, or there isn't corruption, but I don't think things are beyond repair, and they can certainly be worse.

skilled 8y ago
> Perhaps only having Hacker News as your source of news has led to that mentality. Ok, next time I will omit the part where I say that HN has been my only source of news.

solipsism 8y ago

Wow you just shat on people who read the news and people who don't in a single comment, while elevating your own head-buried-in-the-sand preference as the elite choice. I'm not even mad! That's amazing!

skilled 8y ago
Thanks.

smt88 8y ago

> Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. Instead of doubting it, try doing some research. "Age does not impact people’s attentiveness to various news topics. Even the youngest adults are as likely to pay attention to news [...] as older adults. Further, they are no more likely than older adults to follow news on lifestyle topics."[1] > I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. This is incredibly condescending and seemingly not based in any statistical reality. > I know the system is broken, corrupt, beyond repair -- why remind me about it every day? Because knowing how "the system" is broken today (which differ from yesterday or last week) makes you an informed citizen. When enough informed citizens vote, the system is significantly less broken. If you don't inform yourself and vote, you are one of the reasons the system is still dangerously broken. I hope well-run governments are not a matter of life and death for you, because they are for billions of other people. 1. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/social-demographic-differences-news-habits-attitudes/ https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/...

Brometheus 8y ago
Thank you for this reply.
icebraining 8y ago
This is assuming the vote actually has a significant impact on the state of things. I vote, but I'm not sure I could justify that belief with evidence.
- smt88 8y ago
  I saw a meme once that said, "I don't vote because I think it'll fix things. I vote so I know I'm not one of the reasons things are broken." Not sure if that helps, but thank you for voting!
  - icebraining 8y ago
    Sounds like the "Road Not Taken"※ - they think either choice will keep things broken, yet one of them makes all the difference. ※ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18380366 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18380366

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

krapp 8y ago

> For the last 4-5 years, Hacker News has been pretty much my only source of any kind of news outside of the topics that I work with on a daily basis. This is true. Why? Hacker News is a content aggregator, no different than Reddit, Twitter or Facebook. The posters here are not unbiased, nor are they likely to be experts in every subject they comment on, unless it's about tech, and then only maybe. I can understand preferring Hacker News for technical news, or to avoid mainstream news, but as a primary news source? I think you're letting HN's elitist cultural bias cloud your sense of objectivity if you think this one internet forum is a better a news provider than any other.

icebraining 8y ago
I'm not sure OP is saying HN is better. It might simply be the only site they visit regularly that happens to link to mainstream news articles.

giancarlostoro 8y ago

I'm with you, though I sometimes supplement it with news.google.com which at least mentions when certain articles are commentary. If a story interests me enough then I go ahead and research it from all major media sources, especially opposing sides and do my best to form a conclusion that makes sense, usually keeping those to myself since others will only have familiarity with one source or the next. Of course sometimes I land on the not-so-major media sources like blogs that call out mainstream media issues too. I'm what the mainstream media calls a millennial (only discovered I had that title after 10 years of being one apparently, shows how much I buy into the Media). I have seen time and time again how toxic the media can be even for democracy. During the last election where Ron Paul was a candidate they gave him the least amount of air time on television[0][1][2], and thus he became irrelevant to most Americans because they are glued to the TV and the news organizations, he wasn't the kind of person that would of sold advertisement eye balls I guess. I guess if you want a solid candidate to be president buy all the ad space most major news organization will offer? He was a rare gem I got excited to vote for but couldn't. [0]: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/ron-paul-media-blackout-confirmed/336698/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/ron-pau... [1]: http://www.journalism.org/numbers/are-media-ignoring-ron-paul/ http://www.journalism.org/numbers/are-media-ignoring-ron-pau... [2]: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-ron-paul-getting-unfair-media-treatment/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-ron-paul-getting-unfair-medi...

Theodores 8y ago

HN is a good filter. If it makes it to HN and happens in the real world then it probably is worth taking note. Regarding your choice not to watch TV at age 12-13, this reminds me of reading tabloid newspapers at that age or possibly earlier. It all seemed so much below me and for people that must be thick.

sureaboutthis 8y ago
HN is NOT a good filter though it's better than some. Judging by the person's statement, he is around 18 years old. For all I know, so are you. And so are 80% of anonymous "news" sources posted here. Anonymous postings on the internet, no matter where, are the worst thing that has happened to civilization since anonymous reports to the police of wrongdoings of a neighbor.
- gowld 8y ago
  non-anyomous postings are holding their own quite well. google.com/search?q=whatsapp+massacre
- squish78 8y ago
  I can think of a few worse things that have happened to civilization
- Theodores 8y ago
  The comment you are referring to was made by someone considerably older than eighteen. > Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. When people write of the 'new generation' they tend to be a generation older and slightly out of touch with this 'new generation'. I think you are allowing your assumptions to cloud your judgement somewhat. 80% of this so-called 'news' that you are seemingly quite assertive in defending is the creation of PR agencies. Not sure what relevance your comments on 'anonymous news' has to do with my comment. I stand by my original comment, there is no point getting engrossed in the Punch and Judy Trump show, Brexit or anything else of that ilk. There is also another question that has to be asked of news - 'does this affect my life or the world I live in?' This applies to sport too, following with a passion the comings and goings of sports celebrities is a waste of time unless you play the sport yourself. Hence HN is a very good filter. A normal news source will have stories that are clickbait, hard to not be interested in at an entertainment level. This attitude does not mean passivity, a lack of interest in the world and a lack of engagement in politics. On the contrary, people that shout at their TV to the tune of the latest Trumpisms are stuck on their sofa and not doing anything.

GordonS 8y ago

I've done the same, but only for the past few years. I grew tired, emotionally exhausted even, of being bombarded with strongly biased negativity, images of war, brutality, poverty and injustice, NIMBYism and fake outrage - and most of all, at my sense of helplessness against it all. I could do nothing about any of it, and resolved to remove it from my life. Since I did so, I've been much happier. I can't avoid all news - for example, I see non-tech stuff on HN sometimes, or see Trump's latest nonsense in my Twitter timeline - but with the exception of technical stuff on HN, I never seek it out.

thosakwe 8y ago

> Is the new generation reading news? I highly doubt it. I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. I think that you would know more about the information habits of the new generation if you actually researched it, instead of relying on HN as your only news source... This community definitely has a lot of biases of its own, no matter how much it tries to deny it, so really, I think that for anyone, getting news from multiple sources makes it easier to come up with a more holistic interpretation of current events.

tristanperry 8y ago

> I think the new generation is caught up in quizzes that stir up emotions, and psychological tests that determine whether a giraffe is your spirit animal. You're definitely wrong on this point (and as others have said, it's a condescending sentiment). This has always happened. I'm 28 and online quizzes and tests were _very_ common when I was school age. My parent's generation also took lots of quizzes and tests, albeit they were in newspapers and magazines (and you had to tally up your own results).