4 ms·
Part of the problem is that an IPO is not really a fundraising event, often, in practice. Selling shares is just a necessary part of listing. They may not be in
by netcan 8y ago
Part of the problem is that an IPO is not really a fundraising event, often, in practice. Selling shares is just a necessary part of listing. They may not be interested in funds at all.
Instead, the company wants liquidity for existing shareholders or sometimes liquid shares to use as m&a currency.
That tilts the balance in favour of paying a "brokerage fee" in exchange for de-risking and simplification. Occasionally IPOs go badly, and the potential disruption is worrying.
Like with a lot of high finance, competition is weak. So, the "price" of these services is (perhaps, idk personally) high. Also, CEOs run companies, not IPOs. Its just not really a cost you optimize and the market isn't there to optimize it by default.
- tomp 8y ago> company wants liquidity for existing shareholders Do they? Aren't existing shareholders usually bound to hold their shares for some time (e.g. 6 months after the IPO)?
- sutterbomb 8y agoHave to start that clock sometime