> The US military struggled for many years and spent huge amounts of money fighting insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan They kill 100 fighters for one death o

> The US military struggled for many years and spent huge amounts of money fighting insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan They kill 100 fighters for one death on their side, and have control over the natural resources they want. I don't see the bright side for the opposite party. > Trying to fight an insurgency on home soil, without the support of a tax-paying public? Forget about it! That's a better argument. But that would assume the revolution would last. The local population would not have money or food either, but wouldn't have the supply chain or the reserve the military have.