3 ms·
>Google is probably the only non-telco who owns significant infrastructure. So other than Google, the only other option for YouTube would have been a telco Wha
by treis 8y ago
>Google is probably the only non-telco who owns significant infrastructure. So other than Google, the only other option for YouTube would have been a telco
What about Amazon or Microsoft?
- ucaetano 8y agoThey don't own. They's recently (in the past 5 years) started taking part in building, but they don't own anything compared to Google and the major telcos.
- shereadsthenews 8y agoThey both have a lot of datacenters and private fiber between them but neither has anything like the ISP peering network that Google owns. Not even close.