4 ms·
You want the state in charge of managing communications between friends and family members?
by Zecar 8y ago
You want the state in charge of managing communications between friends and family members?
- Qwertystop 8y agoIn the same way/to the same degree that the state manages the phone lines and the postal system, I suppose.
- gotocake 8y agoYes, in the same way they had to bust Ma Bell for the same damned reasons we’re seeing again. Let the state be the dumb pipe or at least ensure that the pipes stay dumb. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than the alternative.
- x220 8y agoThe state already unofficially manages, manipulates, and spies on communication.
- roguecoder 8y agoRather than private corporations who turn around and exploit private communications between friends and family members for maximum profit? Yes. The state could abuse its power: companies do abuse their power, because to do otherwise would reduce shareholder profits.
- x220 8y agoI want the state to specify restrictions on how companies can use the data transmitted in private messages on social networks.
- fixermark 8y agoThe state already has extremely heavy involvement in management of the telephone system. There is plenty of precedent for this being generally benevolent authority.
- lumberjack 8y agoThere are technological solutions that could maximize privacy but they are not in use because the private service provider needs to snoop in on your conversations to build a profile of your life. With a public service we could have a system engineered to maximize privacy. Not to mention real transparency and oversight that is no possible with private services.
- twblalock 8y agoWith a public service we would have a system engineered poorly, like healthcare.gov. The government can't do that kind of thing well.
- Larrikin 8y agoThen state should do what they did to make healthcare.gov work on the second time through. The roll out sucked but it's perfectly fine now
- joshAg 8y agomore than i want facebook or google to, yes.