3 ms·
> 5. Probably a good idea. You probably wouldn't want their fraud detection/audit selection software published. No matter how good it is releasing it gives peo
by rtkwe 8y ago
> 5. Probably a good idea.
You probably wouldn't want their fraud detection/audit selection software published. No matter how good it is releasing it gives people a chance to better avoid detection.
- dragontamer 8y agoI guess that's true. I'm mostly thinking of it from a law-abiding citizen perspective. Maybe make some basic tests available to more easily show that I'm not making the stupid mistakes (an extra "0" somewhere or missing a digit somewhere else). Also, anything that would more easily interface with the IRS's online submission system would be great.
- swish_bob 8y agoThat kind of depends. The software could easily be published without publishing the rules/models that are being run. While knowing what sort of parameters are available to the rules/models might make it easier to identify attacks that aren't going to be found, that's not a given.