2 ms·
> it might tangentially hit their bottom line Take your strawman back. I didn't say "tangentially", I said "explicitly". Anything that is aimed directly at th
by huhtenberg 8y ago
> it might tangentially hit their bottom line
Take your strawman back.
I didn't say "tangentially", I said "explicitly". Anything that is aimed directly at the company itself. Like suggesting to nail the office door shut to prevent any work from being done.
- benj111 8y agoHow is it a straw man? You wrote "to explicitly hurt your company". I'm not sure the word explicitly actually changes the meaning here. I could campaign to introduce a carbon tax. I'm not doing it to explicitly hurt my oil company employer. Even if I know it probably will at some level. There's degrees of 'explicitness'. What about campaigning against fossil fuels if you work for an oil company? What about a car company? Theres a line, and I'm willing to bet it will differ from employee to employer.