> are you sure it protects you from criminal liability if you label something as a deep fake, then other people redistribute it without that label? No, I'm not

> are you sure it protects you from criminal liability if you label something as a deep fake, then other people redistribute it without that label? No, I'm not sure. I said "potentially," but I don't know. I think it may be plausible to argue that labeling a recording outside of the recording itself should be one factor in deciding whether a reasonable observer would consider it authentic. And I think it may also be plausible to argue that doing so protects the labeler, and that (particularly if the license to redistribute requires that the disclaimer be shown in any subsequent distribution channels) only the people who distribute it without the label should be found to have violated the act.