3 ms·
Privacy is not a virtue in itself but a tradeoff between saving individuals and their data and public security (i.e. not helping human traffickers by totally bl
by mcbetz 8y ago
Privacy is not a virtue in itself but a tradeoff between saving individuals and their data and public security (i.e. not helping human traffickers by totally blocking law enforcement).
I continue to trust a country where privacy issues are discussed and ruled objectively at the highest court and where law enforcers can only obtain IP addresses for severe crimes - mentioned in the article: drug trading, illegal arms trading.
Germany is nowhere near China with a civil society so active that every privacy threatening action creates strong counter action (i.e. new Bavarian police law). No, civil society cannot prevent everything that the powerful state wants, but neither can state representatives do as they wish (unlike the CP in China).
These providers also don't sell my data as Google does, because I pay for the service. It still strikes a good balance for me.
Edit: replaced "they" with "state representatives"
- VvR-Ox 8y agoFYI: The bavarian police law has passed though many people tried to stop it. That also happened with a lot of other laws throughout the last years. On the other hand people also love stuff like AMZN echo and trust all information to their smartphones. What's going to stop this development then? A miracle? How do you know providers don't sell data? Did they tell you that or promise it somehow? :-D The obvious conclusion of this development is that we need technical solutions which work without the consent of governments and without putting trust into private companies.