3 ms·
The publication doesn't matter because you're directly contradicting yourself. You just wrote in another comment: > Having a corrupt public servant (if this is
by skrause 8y ago
The publication doesn't matter because you're directly contradicting yourself. You just wrote in another comment:
> Having a corrupt public servant (if this is the case here) does not make a country a "repressive state".
And now you seem to argue that other countries look repressive as well by quoting a single conviction that was invalidated by the ECJ.
- andai 8y agoThat's the opposite of what happened.
- cyphar 8y agoThe EHCR, not the ECJ (the latter of which is related to trade agreements). The EHCR did the opposite of invalidate her conviction -- they upheld the decision of the Austrian court[1]. In other words, they rejected the claim that Austria's anti-blasphemy laws are a violation of human rights (which I disagree with -- though I'm definitely not anti-EU like others in this chain). [1]: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/its-not-free-speech-criticize-muhammad-echr-ruled/574174/ https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/its-not-fr...