3 ms·
That's also physical access. My point is that $TLA couldn't get DNA to implicate $TARGET in a murder, if they don't know where $TARGET is. Or know anyone who d
by mirimir 8y ago
That's also physical access.
My point is that $TLA couldn't get DNA to implicate $TARGET in a murder, if they don't know where $TARGET is. Or know anyone who does. But if they can obtain $TARGET's DNA test results, they could fabricate evidence.
- coldtea 8y ago>That's also physical access. We've already discussing the situation that someone is committing an actual crime for which they want to frame another. Compared to that, getting "physical access" to someone's hair saloon is a trivial part. >My point is that $TLA couldn't get DNA to implicate $TARGET in a murder, if they don't know where $TARGET is. Why wouldn't they know where $TARGET is? That's the easiest thing to know. That would only be a problem is they wanted to implicate fugitives already on the run or in hiding, or Waldo.