4 ms·
> if you are for development of undeveloped land In SF at least, Sierra Club priorities are (at least facially) decidedly more “anti-development” than “pro-env
by cobbzilla 8y ago
> if you are for development of undeveloped land
In SF at least, Sierra Club priorities are (at least facially) decidedly more “anti-development” than “pro-environment”.
How does one explain their opposition to SB 827 [1] through an environmental lens? If we don’t build more density somewhere then we inevitably get more sprawl.
To add some meldodrama, how many people must die in the streets before we move the lever to help our fellow human? To some, “saving the Earth” can justify any amount of human suffering.
[1] https://www.ethanelkind.com/sierra-club-now-opposes-one-of-the-most-important-climate-bills-in-california/ https://www.ethanelkind.com/sierra-club-now-opposes-one-of-t...